PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025SAGE Open Nursing22 citationsOpen Access

Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices, and Barriers Regarding the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Nursing and Health Sciences Education: A Systematic Review

View Full Paper
NANesreen AlqaissiMQMohammad Qtait

Key Points

  • Students showed high awareness of artificial intelligence, yet formal training was often lacking.
  • Positive attitudes towards AI coexisted with ethical concerns and anxiety about its use in health contexts.
  • A systematic analysis encompassing both quantitative and qualitative studies highlighted significant barriers to AI integration.
  • Gaps in current curricula signal urgent calls for curriculum integration and faculty development in AI education.

Abstract

Background Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare education and practice, making it essential for nursing and health sciences students to develop relevant competencies. However, their preparedness to engage meaningfully with AI in academic and clinical environments remains uncertain. Objectives This systematic review synthesizes global evidence on the knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers (KAPB) related to AI among students in nursing, medicine, pharmacy, and allied health disciplines. Methods Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Google Scholar for peer-reviewed articles published between January 2020 and February 2025. Fourteen studies meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed using narrative synthesis. Both quantitative and qualitative studies were included. The review protocol was not registered. Results Students generally demonstrated high awareness of AI, but formal training was limited. Knowledge was often acquired informally through social media or peer networks. While attitudes toward AI were largely positive, students expressed ethical concerns and anxiety related to AI use. Practical engagement with AI was mostly restricted to academic writing tasks, with minimal clinical application. Major barriers included the absence of AI-focused curricula, limited faculty expertise, inadequate infrastructure, and concerns over data privacy, ethics, and job displacement. Conclusion Despite growing interest in AI, significant gaps remain in health sciences education. Comprehensive strategies such as curriculum integration, faculty development, and ethical training are urgently needed to foster responsible, confident, and clinically relevant AI adoption among future healthcare professionals.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alqaissi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c182589b7b07f3a060efb7https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608251374185
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper