Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review categorizes video text retrieval methods into single-granularity and multi-granularity approaches, highlighting their effectiveness in bridging the semantic gap.
Video text retrieval is a hot research topic in artificial intelligence, with the core challenge being the semantic gap between visual dynamic features and discrete linguistic symbols. In recent years, with the development of large-scale models, cross-modal modeling capabilities have significantly improved, driving continuous evolution in retrieval methods regarding granularity modeling strategies. This article provides a systematic review of research methods in video text retrieval, categorizing them into single-granularity retrieval and multi-granularity retrieval. Single-granularity retrieval focuses on modeling a single semantic layer. Coarse-grained methods achieve efficient retrieval through global feature matching using pre-trained models, but they suffer from incomplete semantic coverage. Fine-grained methods enhance semantic analysis accuracy through local alignment mechanisms, but they are constrained by inherent limitations. In contrast, multi-granularity retrieval combines global scene understanding and local detail perception through hierarchical feature fusion strategies, with typical technical approaches including dynamic fusion frameworks. Analysis results indicate that multi-granularity retrieval can more comprehensively capture cross-modal semantic associations, providing a more effective solution for video text retrieval.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: