The study develops a framework for dynamic equilibria with nonsmooth utilities, showing complementarity outcomes and numerical methods for practical applications.
We develop a comprehensive dynamic Walrasian framework entirely in L∞ so that prices and allocations are essentially bounded, and market clearing holds pointwise almost everywhere. Utilities are allowed to be locally Lipschitz and quasi-concave; we employ Clarke subgradients to derive generalized quasi-variational inequalities (GQVIs). We endogenize inventories through a capital-accumulation constraint, leading to a differential QVI (dQVI). Existence is proved under either strong monotonicity or pseudo-monotonicity and coercivity. We establish Walras’ law, complementarity, stability and sensitivity of the equilibrium correspondence in L²-metrics, incorporate time-discounting and uncertainty on Ω×[0,T], and present convergent numerical schemes (Rockafellar–Wets penalties and extragradient). Our results close the “in mean vs pointwise” gap noted in dynamic models and connect to modern decomposition approaches for QVIs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Francesco Rania (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: