Qualitative analysis reveals severe financial impact and service mismatch in Nigerian tertiary institutions, suggesting urgent policy reforms.
This paper critically examines the challenges associated with the migration of Nigerian tertiary institutions to the Band A electricity tariff system, which mandates higher costs for ostensibly improved supply. Utilizing a qualitative research design, the study integrated comprehensive document analysis of regulatory frameworks (NERC), institutional financial records, and news reports, with in-depth semi-structured interviews. A total of fifteen key administrators, purposefully selected from five diverse public higher institutions across Nigeria, provided insights into the financial, operational, and social ramifications. The methodology focused on capturing varied perspectives on budget constraints, resource reallocation, and the impact on students' learning environments. Findings reveal a pervasive mismatch between the promised service and delivered supply, resulting in crippling debt, extreme rationing of electricity (often 2-4 hours daily), and a wave of student unrest, as exemplified by protests at Adamawa State Polytechnic. The study underscores the urgent need for policy re-evaluation, including differentiated tariffs, increased government subventions, and investment in sustainable alternative energy solutions to safeguard educational quality and institutional viability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mathew et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: