Analysis reveals new constraints and opportunities for singly charged scalar particles in dark sectors.
We investigate current experimental constraints and future search prospects for a hypothetical <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>S</a:mi><a:mi>U</a:mi><a:mo stretchy="false">(</a:mo><a:mn>2</a:mn><a:msub><a:mo stretchy="false">)</a:mo><a:mi>w</a:mi></a:msub></a:math> and <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mi>S</e:mi><e:mi>U</e:mi><e:mo stretchy="false">(</e:mo><e:mn>3</e:mn><e:msub><e:mo stretchy="false">)</e:mo><e:mi>c</e:mi></e:msub></e:math> singlet spin-zero particle that carries unit electric charge: a singly charged scalar (SCS). In addition to providing useful benchmarks for collider searches, SCS particles are also well-motivated ingredients in relatively minimal dark sectors. We focus on scenarios in which the SCS decays promptly at colliders to a lepton plus either a neutrino or an invisible dark-sector particle of negligible mass. A promptly decaying SCS can easily have appreciable branching ratios to more than one lepton flavor while remaining consistent with constraints on lepton flavor violation. This broadens the allowed range of SCS masses to extend well beyond those for right-handed selectrons, smuons, or staus. For particular benchmark SCS branching ratios, we find that SCS masses above <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:mo>∼</i:mo><i:mn>185</i:mn><i:mtext> </i:mtext><i:mtext> </i:mtext><i:mi>GeV</i:mi></i:math> and in a lower-mass window <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:mrow><k:mo>∼</k:mo><k:mn>80</k:mn><k:mi>–</k:mi><k:mn>125</k:mn><k:mtext> </k:mtext><k:mtext> </k:mtext><k:mi>GeV</k:mi></k:mrow></k:math> are still allowed at 95% confidence level. We carry out Monte Carlo simulations to explore the potential of a boosted-decision-tree-based analysis to probe the surviving SCS parameter space in future searches at the (HL-)LHC, finding a significant increase in sensitivity relative to cut-based analyses both in the lower-mass window and at higher SCS masses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Das et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: