Feasibility randomized controlled trial shows effective delivery of supervised exercise for stroke and TIA patients, suggesting enhancements for goal-setting.
Background and Purpose Mobile health (mHealth) offers a promising platform for promoting physical activity (PA) in individuals post-stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). However, the extent to which key intervention components of PA promotion can be adapted to a digital format remains unclear. This study examines the fidelity of delivering supervised physical exercise and support for individualized PA goals in a 6-month mHealth intervention. Methods This feasibility randomized controlled trial included individuals post-stroke or TIA who participated in the mHealth version of the i-REBOUND program. Descriptive statistics were used to assess format (individual/group), and progression of supervised exercise, as well as the characteristics of PA goals (type and use of action planning) throughout the intervention. Results Of the 57 participants enrolled in the i-REBOUND program (mean age: 71 years; 70% with stroke), 51 (89%) completed the intervention. Of the 1391 total exercise sessions delivered, the majority (62%) were performed at moderate or higher intensity (Borg rating ≥11). Additionally, 39 participants (71%) demonstrated exercise progression, and 49 participants (89%) participated in group sessions. A total of 293 PA goals were established, predominantly with a focus on performing a desired behavior. Defining frequency (88%), context (61%) and duration (53%) of PA goals was common, while defining intensity (25%) was less so. Discussion and conclusions This study support the implementation of a mHealth-delivered supervised exercise program for people post-stroke or TIA, achieving target intensity, integrating group sessions, and progression. Refining goal-setting strategies to address diverse action planning components may enhance future mHealth interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bezuidenhout et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: