Proposed method reduces integrity risk and enhances accuracy in SBAS, suggesting potential for improved navigation reliability.
To address the limitations in positioning accuracy and the risk of integrity degradation in Satellite-Based Augmentation Systems (SBAS) user-end after applying augmentation information, this study proposes a positioning algorithm integrating an improved IGG III robust estimation method. By using integrity information from SBAS, this method improves protection level calculations and better adjusts observed weights by adding new factors to the weight function model. This improvement allows for better discrimination between reliable and anomalous measurements, thereby enhancing positioning accuracy, reducing integrity risks, and improving availability. Experimental results show that, compared to conventional SBAS user positioning, the proposed method achieves notable performance improvements across various scenarios. In static environments, it reduces horizontal integrity risk by up to 6.7%, increases availability by up to 6.6%, and improves positioning accuracy by up to 71.3%. In urban vehicular environments, horizontal integrity risk is reduced by 0.5%, availability is increased by 0.5%, and accuracy improves by up to 58.7%. In Unmanned Aerial Vehicle flight scenarios, horizontal integrity risk is reduced by 2.8%, availability increases by 2.8%, and accuracy improves by up to 50.38%. In all scenarios, vertical integrity risk is completely eliminated and availability improves slightly. Additionally, compared to the conventional IGG III estimator, the improved method offers more effective control over weight adjustment during solution estimation, thereby avoiding excessive down-weighting and mitigating overbounding of protection levels. These results demonstrate the potential of the proposed method to improve the performance and reliability of SBAS user-end under both static and dynamic conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: