Field and geochronological analyses reveal three metamorphic stages in the Shangdan Shear Zone, indicating intricate P-T-t-D relationships.
Comprehensive field, petrographic, mineral chemical, zircon U-Pb geochronological, phase equilibrium modelling, and microstructural and crystallographic preferred orientation (CPO) analyses of garnet gneisses and garnet amphibolites from the eastern Shangdan Shear Zone (SSZ) in the Qinling Orogen reveal a three-stage Early Paleozoic P-T-t-D evolution. The garnet-bearing lithologies collectively define a clockwise P-T trajectory within the mid- to lower-crust, characterized by progressive burial heating, near-isothermal decompression, and subsequent near-isobaric cooling. The three metamorphic-deformational stages are as follows: Stage 1 (ca. 510–480 Ma) records high- to ultrahigh-pressure metamorphism ( ≥30 kbar, ≥700°C) in mantle-depth slivers triggered by northward subduction of the Shangdan oceanic plate, coeval with high-pressure granulite-facies metamorphism (14–15 kbar, 755–775°C) in the lower crust. A steeply dipping penetrative S1 foliation developed during this stage, consistent with NNE–SSW compressional tectonics. Stage 2 (ca. 480–450 Ma) exhibits rapid exhumation-driven retrograde paths characterized by near-isothermal decompression (14–15 kbar → 5.8–7.6 kbar at 725–758°C), with tectonic quiescence facilitating vertical transport of metamorphic complexes along the SSZ. Stage 3 (ca. 420–400 Ma) marks near-isobaric cooling to amphibolite-facies conditions (4.5–6.8 kbar, 550–620°C) during continental collision between the north and south Qinling belts, where syn-kinematic sinistral shearing was dynamically coupled with retrograde metamorphism under transpressional regimes. This study establishes genetic linkages between discrete metamorphic stages and regional deformation events, reconstructs a coherent Early Palaeozoic metamorphic-deformational chronology, and elucidates the coupling mechanisms between deformation and metamorphism during the evolution of the SSZ.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: