Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis of least-cost optimization pathways for carbon capture indicates significant emissions reductions in Indonesia's power sector.
Indonesia’s power sector is heavily reliant on coal, making it a major contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This study evaluates the role of carbon capture (CC) as a transitional mitigation strategy using the Low Emissions Analysis Platform (LEAP) for least-cost optimization. Five scenarios up to 2060 are assessed: Business as Usual (BAU), a renewables-only pathway (NRE), two carbon-capture strategies (CALL and CNEW), and a hybrid scenario (COMB). Results show that NRE eliminates fossil power plants but increases system costs by 3.2% and raises reliability challenges due to the variability of solar generation. CALL achieves the lowest abatement cost (USD 0.93/tCO2e) but leaves 105 Mt CO2e residual emissions by 2060. COMB provides the most balanced outcome, cutting emissions by 96% (40 Mt CO2e), increasing costs by only 1.9%, and ensuring energy security by combining CC with renewable expansion. These findings highlight that a hybrid strategy offers a pragmatic, least-cost pathway for Indonesia to align its power sector with net-zero targets while maintaining grid adequacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anindhita et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: