This review critiques Carroll's text on philosophical aesthetics in art history, highlighting heteronymists versus autonomists. It questions the dominance of autonomism in the narrative.
In this review of Noël Carroll's Classics in Western Philosophy of Art (Hackett, 2022), I outline the merits of this text as both an introductory overview to philosophical aesthetics and a valuable companion to its classic texts. I also focus critical attention on the particular narrative it develops in which the history of Western aesthetics is a struggle between “heteronymists,” who see art as integral to social and moral life, and “autonomists,” who see art as an independent sphere of value. In particular, I invite the reader to question Carroll's claim that it is a narrative according to which the latter comes out ahead.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jason Miller (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: