This analysis derives symptom validity indicators in TBI, suggesting effective assessment methods.
Symptom validity assessment is an important component of the evaluation of psychological sequelae of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Many personality inventories have embedded symptom validity scales (SVTs). A growing body of research reports derivation of embedded SVTs in brief symptom and self-report measures. We sought to develop embedded SVT indicators based on the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18). This project involved secondary analysis of TRACK-TBI data obtained from the Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Research Informatics System repository. Participants (N = 1,694) sustained TBI (n = 1,515) and or non-head orthopedic injury (n = 179). Independent SVTs were used to identify TBI cases with questionable validity (QV). Two novel SVTs were examined: BSI-V, which was developed using Bayesian model averaging (BMA) to determine a subset of BSI-18 items that predict QV, and BSI GSI, which is a total score cutoff based on the BSI-18 Global Severity Index. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to compare classification accuracy of BSI-V and BSI GSI. Four BSI-18 items were determined to be optimal predictors of QV. The BSI-V and BSI GSI both showed outstanding discrimination with area under the ROC curve (AUC) of .95. BSI-V (≥5) and BSI GSI (≥64 T) cutoffs showed 83% sensitivity and 90% specificity. Findings provide preliminary evidence of novel embedded SVTs in the BSI-18 with comparable support for BSI-V and BSI GSI. These findings warrant independent cross-validation to provide additional evidence of classification accuracy and refine cutoffs prior to implementation in practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davis et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: