Analysis shows enhanced seismic performance of buried pipes under strike-slip fault conditions, indicating geofoam's effectiveness in mitigating damage.
This study evaluates the benefits of the adoption of geofoam blocks to improve the seismic performance of buried steel pipes for simulating the complex material-structure interaction under strike-slip fault rupture conditions. Comparison of the response of improved models with conventional ones considering the parameters as fault crossing angle, fault slip amount and pipeline wall thickness is evaluated. A set of limit states was defined based on the violation of the tensile strain limit: onset of local buckling, rate of cross-sectional distortion and crushing of the EPS Geofoam blocks are adopted as performance criteria. Obtained results indicate that in general, the use of both low- and high-density geofoam blocks significantly improved the seismic performance of pipelines. The critical fault displacement value (dcr) leading to failure increases by more than 130% for high-density EPS. Moreover, use of geofoam blocks led to a more distributed damage pattern along the pipe, thus reducing localized strain accumulation and eventually pipeline failure. Additionally, increasing the fault crossing angle (β) from 10° to 30° and reducing the pipeline diameter-to-wall-thickness ratio (D/t) from 144 to 58 to enhance the beneficial effect of geofoam blocks in critical fault displacement value seemed to be achievable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perdibuka et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: