This framework demonstrates reduced network losses and improved voltage in radial distribution networks, suggesting effective planning for DG and EVCS.
Distribution System Operators (DSOs) increasingly need planning tools that coordinate utility-influenced assets—such as electric-vehicle charging stations (EVCS) and voltage-support resources—with customer-sited distributed generation (DG). We present a Nash-equilibrium-based Iterative Best Response Algorithm (IBRA-NE) for joint planning of DG and EVCS in radial distribution networks. The framework supports two applicability modes: (i) a DSO-plannable mode that co-optimizes EVCS siting/sizing and utility-controlled reactive support (DG operated as VAR resources or functionally equivalent devices), and (ii) a customer-sited mode that treats DG locations as fixed while optimizing DG reactive set-points/sizes and EVCS siting. The objective minimizes network losses and voltage deviation while incorporating deployment costs and EV charging service penalties, subject to standard operating limits. A backward/forward sweep (BFS) load flow with Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) captures load and generation uncertainty; a Bus Voltage Deviation Index (BVDI) helps identify weak buses. On the EEU 114-bus system, the method reduces base-case losses by up to 57.9% and improves minimum bus voltage from 0.757 p.u. to 0.931 p.u.; performance remains robust under a 20% load increase. The framework explicitly accommodates regulatory contexts where DG siting is customer-driven by treating DG locations as fixed in such cases while optimizing EVCS siting and sizing under DSO planning authority. A mixed scenario with 5 DGs and 3 EVCS demonstrates coordinated benefits and convergence properties relative to PSO, GWO, RFO, and ARFO. Additionally, the proposed algorithm is also tested on the IEEE 69-bus system and results in acceptable performance. The results indicate that game-theoretic coordination, applied in a manner consistent with regulatory roles, provides a practical pathway for DSOs to plan EV infrastructure and reactive support in networks with uncertain DER behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biramo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: