This framework improves seizure detection accuracy via federated learning and lightweight network design, suggesting viable clinical applications.
This study investigates on-edge seizure detection that aims to resolve two major constraints that hold the deployment of deep learning models in clinical settings at present. First, centralized training requires gathering and consolidating data across institutions, which poses a serious issue of privacy. Second, a high computational overhead inherent in inference imposes a crushing burden on resource-limited edge devices. Hence, we propose NeuroFed-LightTCN, a federated learning (FL) framework, incorporating a lightweight temporal convolutional network (TCN), designed for resource-efficient and privacy-preserving seizure detection. The proposed framework integrates depthwise separable convolutions, grouped with structured pruning to enhance efficiency, scalability, and performance. Furthermore, asynchronous aggregation is employed to mitigate training overhead. Empirical tests demonstrate that the network can be reduced fully to 70% with a 44.9% decrease in parameters (65.4 M down to 34.9 M and an inferencing latency of 56 ms) and still maintain 97.11% accuracy, a metric that outperforms both the non-FL and FL TCN optimizations. Ablation shows that asynchronous aggregation reduces training times by 3.6 to 18%, and pruning sustains performance even at extreme sparsity: an F1-score of 97.17% at a 70% pruning rate. Overall, the proposed NeuroFed-LightTCN addresses the trade-off between computational efficiency and model performance, delivering a viable solution to federated edge-device learning. Through the interaction of federated-optimization-driven approaches and lightweight architectural innovation, scalable and privacy-aware machine learning can be a practical reality, without compromising accuracy, and so its potential utility can be expanded to the real world.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: