Functional beverages enhanced antioxidant properties using rebaudioside-A, indicating a viable sugar alternative.
Background: Excessive sugar intake is a major global health issue, fuelling non-communicable diseases and driving consumer demand for nutrient-rich, low-calorie beverages without artificial additives. Functional beverages (FB) present an effective solution by conveniently delivering targeted health benefits. Rebaudioside-A (Reb-A), a natural, zero-calorie sweetener derived from Stevia rebaudiana, provides a promising alternative to sugar and artificial sweeteners, enabling the development of all-natural, low-calorie FBs. Objective: This study aimed to develop a FB with soluble fibre, in two versions: one sweetened with sugar (SSB) and another with Reb-A (RAB), and compare their sensory, physicochemical, and functional properties. Methods: Both SSB and RAB were prepared from pomegranate, raspberry, and lemon juices, as well as green tea, coconut water, and inulin. The beverages were pasteurized (85°C, 1 min) and stored at 3–4°C. Analyses included pH, total soluble solids (TSS), water activity, colour, antioxidant properties (FRAP, total phenolic content - TPC, DPPH, and total anthocyanin content - TAC), and sensory evaluation using a 9-point hedonic scale for taste, odour, colour, and overall acceptance. Results: The RAB finished product demonstrated higher antioxidant activity, with higher DPPH scavenging (p<0.05) and increased FRAP values (p<0.05) compared to SSB. Both beverages presented the same pH, TPC, TAC, water activity levels, and inulin content (5.5 g/serving). Sensory evaluations revealed an overall preference of 70.5% for SSB (p = 0.001), although female participants (42% of the cohort) showed no significant preference. Acceptability indices were high for both (SSB: 83.4%, RAB: 76.9%; p = 0.003), with RAB scoring above 6/9 across all attributes. There were no differences in colour or odour between the two beverages Novelty of the Study: This study is among the first to systematically develop and compare functional beverages (FBs)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Sullivan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: