This research proposes a tool for assessing self-evaluation reports in higher education, indicating compliance with national guidelines and quality standards.
Self-evaluation is the starting point of the evaluation process in higher education. It is an ongoing process of institutional self-knowledge and self-criticism, which is an essential tool for reflecting on the institution's identity and for supporting decision-making and action planning. However, for self-evaluation to achieve its objectives, it must also be evaluated (meta-evaluated). Given the importance of understanding and analyzing the procedures and results of the Institutional Self-Assessment reports prepared by Higher Education Institutions, the aim of this research was to develop a summative meta-evaluation instrument designed to verify the degree of compliance of the AAI reports with the guidelines of the National Higher Education Evaluation System (Sinaes) and the quality standards established by the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (JCSEE).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miranda et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: