Framework identifies key advising values in academic advising, highlighting the role of autonomy in AI tools.
This study presents an Autonomy-values framework for analysing, designing, and selecting AI academic advising systems. Through focus groups with advisors using Nominal Group Technique, we identified contextually specific values that were then generalised using Legitimation Code Theory's Autonomy lens. The resulting framework maps advising values across four positions: Student-Centred, Advisor-Centred, Institution-Centred, and Social-Centred. By combining values-sensitive design with LCT Autonomy, this work advances knowledge on human-centred approaches to AI implementation in academic advising and broader educational contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bosman et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: