Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This research demonstrates the Sandwich Asymmetric Folded Beam design, improving in-plane stiffness in diaphragm flexures while minimizing under-constraint.
Diaphragm flexures are widely used in various precision applications to generate guided motion along the out-of-plane directions and provide load-bearing along the in-plane directions. The traditional Asymmetric Simple Beam (ASB) design suffers from parasitic rotation about the out-of-plane direction. The Asymmetric Folded Beam (AFB) design eliminates or minimizes the parasitic rotation seen in the ASB design and offers desirably low out-of-plane stiffness. However, its in-plane stiffness is undesirably low and exhibits a steep drop with increasing the out-of-plane displacement due to the under-constraint of the unsupported ends of the folded beams. This paper proposes a novel diaphragm flexure design, referred to as the Sandwich Asymmetric Folded Beam with Parallelogram Flexure Module in-plane interconnect (SAFB-PFM), that minimizes the under-constraint of the folded beams in the AFB design, thereby achieving a substantial improvement in the in-plane stiffness without much impact on the out-of-plane stiffness. This novel design comprises a sandwich arrangement of two identical AFB diaphragm flexures spaced apart along the out-of-plane direction, with out-of-plane interconnects between the two corresponding diaphragms, the two corresponding frames, and every pair of the corresponding unsupported ends of folded beams and in-plane interconnect between the unsupported ends of each AFB layer. The optimal bearing performance of the SAFB-PFM design is demonstrated via nonlinear Finite Element Analysis (FEA) followed by several physical design observations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Radgolchin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: