PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes16 citations

Global real-world data on Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF): challenges in optimisation and sex disparities

View Full Paper
AAAndrea AttanasioGGGianluigi GuidaGDGiandomenico Disabato

Key Points

  • Only 20% of patients with heart failure received quadruple therapy, showing substantial clinical inertia.
  • Each additional class of heart failure therapy led to a significant mortality reduction (p < 0.001), underscoring the importance of adherence.
  • The retrospective analysis of 17,668 patients was derived from the TriNetX database, providing a global perspective on treatment patterns.
  • No significant differences in survival were found between sexes, indicating the need for targeted clinical trials focusing on drug efficacy.

Abstract

Despite the advancements in the treatment of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), clinical inertia regarding the prescription of the four classes of guidelines-directed medical therapies (GDMT) remains prevalent. This study aims to assess how adherence and time of prescription to GDMT in HFrEF impact mortality. Additionally, it seeks to evaluate sex differences in prescription, and outcome. The study retrospectively analysed data worldwide using the TriNetX database. Patients with HFrEF were divided into four groups (G1-G4) based on the number of classes of GDMT prescribed. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Additional analysis was performed in the G4 group to examine the impact of the time to reach quadruple therapy on mortality. An age-matched subgroup analysis was conducted to assess whether sex influenced mortality. The total cohort included 17,668 patients (68% men, mean age 66.7±14.6). Only 20% of patients received quadruple therapy; the least HF medications prescribed were MRA (39%) and SGLT2i (33%) especially among older and frail patients).Each additional HF therapy was associated with significant mortality reduction (p-value < 0.001 for each additional class prescribed). However, the timing of full treatment implementation within the first year did not significantly affect mortality in G4 group. No significant sex-based differences in survival were found in the age-matched analysis. Clinical inertia remains a critical issue, especially in those who may most benefit from HF therapy. Further clinical trials should specifically assess sex-related differences in drug efficacy and patient characteristics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Attanasio et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1885e9b7b07f3a061279chttps://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaf095
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper