Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-species comparison reveals effective solvents for metabolite profiling in botanical ingredients, indicating improved supplier verification.
Metabolite fingerprint profiling is a robust tool for verifying suppliers of authentic botanical ingredients. While comparative studies exist, few apply identical conditions across multiple species; this study utilized a cross-species comparison to identify versatile solvents despite biochemical variability. Multiple solvents were used for sample extraction prior to analysis by proton NMR and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) for multiple botanicals including Camellia sinensis, Cannabis sativa, Myrciaria dubia, Sambucus nigra, Zingiber officinale, Curcuma longa, Silybum marianum, Vaccinium macrocarpon, and Prunus cerasus. Comparisons were normalized by total intensity; deuterated methanol aids NMR lock but is not required for LC-MS. Hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) evaluated solvent efficacy. Methanol-deuterium oxide (1:1) was the most effective extraction method, yielding 155 NMR spectral metabolite variables for Camellia sinensis, while methanol (90% CH3OH + 10% CD3OD) produced 198 for Cannabis sativa and 167 for Myrciaria dubia, with 11, 9, and 28 assigned metabolites, respectively. LC-MS detected 121 metabolites in Myrciaria dubia in methanol as the most effective extraction method. Methanol (10% deuterated) is the most effective extraction method for comprehensive metabolite fingerprinting using NMR and LC-MS protocols because it provides the broadest metabolite coverage. This study advances fit-for-purpose methods to qualify suppliers of botanical ingredients in food and NHP quality control programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vinayagam et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: