Research shows 41% HR-HPV prevalence in HIV-infected women, suggesting urgent vaccination in Gabon.
Background/Objectives. Women living with human immunodeficiency virus (WLWH) have a six-fold higher risk of developing cervical cancer associated with high-risk human Papillomavirus (HR-HPV) than HIV-negative women. We herein assessed HR-HPV genotype distribution and plasma levels of the cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) in WLWH in a rural town in Gabon, in Central Africa. Methods. Adult WLWH attending the local HIV outpatient center were prospectively enrolled and underwent cervical visual inspection and cervicovaginal and blood sampling. HIV RNA load and CA-125 levels were measured from plasma using the Cepheid® Xpert® HIV-1 Viral Load kit and BioMérieux VIDAS® CA-125 II assay, respectively. HPV detection and genotyping were performed via a nested polymerase chain reaction (MY09/11 and GP5+/6+), followed by sequencing. Results. Fifty-eight WLWH (median age: 52 years) were enrolled. Median CD4 count was 547 cells/µL (IQR: 412.5-737.5) and HIV RNA load 4.88 Log10 copies/mL (IQR: 3.79-5.49). HPV prevalence was 68.96%, with HR-HPV detected in 41.37% of women. Among HR-HPV-positive samples, 87.5% (21/24) were genotypes targeted by the Gardasil vaccine, while 12.5% (3/24) were non-vaccine types. Predominant HR-HPV types included HPV-16 (13.8%), HPV-33 (10.34%), HPV-35 (5.17%), HPV-31, and HPV-58 (3.45%). Most participants had normal cervical cytology (62.07%), and a minority (14.29%) had elevated CA-125 levels, with no correlation to cytological abnormalities. Conclusions. In the hinterland of Gabon, WLWH are facing an unsuspected yet substantial burden of cervical HR-HPV infection and a neglected risk for cervical cancer. Strengthening cervical cancer prevention through targeted HPV vaccination, sexual education, and accessible screening strategies will help in mitigating associated risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mboumba-Mboumba et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: