Experiments reveal AI influences recruitment and employee effort in evaluations, impacting demographics.
We use multiple experiments to explore the effects of artificial intelligence (AI) in employee evaluations and whether these effects differ based on employee demographics. Experiment 1 investigates whether having AI—as opposed to a White male manager—conduct employee performance evaluations affects firms’ recruiting efforts. We find that AI evaluators appear equally attractive to prospective employees from different demographic groups, whereas White male evaluators appear less attractive to under-represented minorities. Experiment 2 examines how current employees respond to receiving negative performance evaluations. We find that, after a negative performance evaluation, under-represented minorities provide less effort compared with White males under White male evaluators, but this difference is eliminated under AI evaluators. Collectively, our results provide evidence of costs and benefits related to the use of AI in performance evaluations and that, overall, this use differentially affects employees of different demographics. Data Availability: Data are available upon request. JEL Classifications: M12; M14; M41; M52.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brown et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: