PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Physics of Fluids0 citations

An approximate Riemann solver approach in physics-informed neural networks for hyperbolic conservation laws

View Full Paper
JUJorge F. UrbánJPJ. A. Pons

Key Points

  • The new method produces sharper transitions between shocks while maintaining a smooth profile in small vortex structures.
  • Utilizing an approximate Roe Riemann solver, this approach improves solution accuracy across discontinuities in two-dimensional problems.
  • Introducing a generalized LLPINN methodology enables dynamic shock speed computation through entropy constraints.
  • Compared to classical high-order solvers, these improvements address conventional PINN challenges in capturing discontinuous solutions.

Abstract

This study enhances the application of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for modeling discontinuous solutions in both hydrodynamics and relativistic hydrodynamics. Conventional PINNs, trained with partial differential equation residuals, frequently face convergence issues and lower accuracy near discontinuities. To address these issues, we build on the recently proposed locally linearized PINNs (LLPINNs), which improve shock detection by modifying the Jacobian matrix resulting from the linearization of the equations, only in regions where the velocity field exhibits strong compression. However, the original LLPINN framework required a priori knowledge of shock velocities, limiting its practical utility. We present a generalized LLPINN method that dynamically computes shock speeds using neighboring states and applies jump conditions through entropy constraints. Additionally, we introduce locally Roe PINNs (LRPINNs), which incorporate an approximate Roe Riemann solver to improve shock resolution and conservation properties across discontinuities. These methods are adapted to two-dimensional Riemann problems by using a divergence-based shock detection combined with dimensional splitting, delivering precise solutions. Compared to a high-order weighted essentially non-oscillatory solver, our method produces sharper shock transitions but smoother solutions in areas with small-scale vortex structures. Future research will aim to improve the resolution of these small-scale features without compromising the model's ability to accurately capture shocks.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Urbán et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c189e09b7b07f3a0613bf6https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0285282
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper