Observational analysis revealed altered pharmacokinetics of cefquinome in endotoxemic sheep, suggesting meloxicam affects its efficacy.
Objective The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of meloxicam on the pharmacokinetics of cefquinome in experimental endotoxemic sheep. In addition, the MIC of cefquinome was determined against Escherichia coli , Pasteurella multocida , Klebsiella pneumoniae , and Mannheimia haemolytica . Methods The study was carried out on six sheep in three periods according to a longitudinal pharmacokinetic design. Cefquinome (2.5 mg/kg, IV, CFQ) was administered in the first period, cefquinome+meloxicam (1 mg/kg, IV, CFQ+MLX) in the second period, and lipopolysaccharide (20 µg/kg, IV, LPS+CFQ+MLX)+meloxicam+cefquinome in the third period. Plasma cefquinome concentrations were assayed using HPLC‐UV, and pharmacokinetic data were calculated by a two‐compartment open model. Results Following a single IV injection of cefquinome, the t 1/2β , V dss , and Cl T values were 1.12 h, 0.21 L/kg, and 0.17 L/h/kg, respectively. The t 1/2β was prolonged from 1.12 to 2.79 h in the LPS+CFQ+MLX group. While V dss was increased (from 0.21 to 0.36 L/kg) in the LPS+CFQ+MLX group, Cl T decreased (from 0.17 to 0.10 L/h/kg) in the CFQ+MLX and LPS+CFQ+MLX groups. The MICs of cefquinome were 0.031 to 0.063 µg/mL for E. coli, M. haemolytica , and K. pneumoniae and 0.016 to 1 µg/mL for P. multocida . At a 12 h dosing interval, the CFQ, CFQ+MLX, and LPS+CFQ+MLX groups attained a T > MIC ratio of 40% for bacteria with MIC values of ≤ 0.50, ≤ 1, and ≤ 1 µg/mL, respectively. Conclusion These results indicate that combined administration of meloxicam alters the pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy of cefquinome in experimental endotoxemic sheep.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uslu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: