Cross-sectional survey reveals disparities in mental health help-seeking among migrants, suggesting implications for intervention.
Aims: To examine differences in help-seeking for mental health problems among migrants and non-migrants in Norway and to consider the role of symptom severity, acknowledgement of a mental health problem and region of origin. Methods: We used data from a cross-sectional, online Norwegian Country Public Health Survey conducted in 2021. A total of 32,126 people, aged 18+ years, were included in the analyses, of which 8% were migrants. Around 60% of these were from countries within the European Economic Area, associated countries or the UK, USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand (EEA+). Results: Migrants from non-EEA+ countries showed higher odds of having sought professional mental health help than non-migrants, but this difference attenuated when controlling for sociodemographic factors, psychological distress and self-reported depression. An interaction revealed that at higher, but not lower, levels of psychological distress, non-EEA+ migrants had significantly lower odds of having sought help. Moreover, a stratified analysis indicated that this applied only to those without self-reported depression. Conclusions: At high levels of psychological distress, people from non-EEA+ regions living in Norway may not be getting professional support for mental health problems to the same extent as EEA+ migrants and non-migrants. This may especially be the case for those who do not perceive their symptoms as a mental health problem. Consequently, improving the ability to recognise mental health problems may be a possible avenue for reducing the treatment gap for migrants with high symptom levels, though longitudinal studies would be required to confirm this.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Straiton et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: