Systematic analysis reveals insights on alpha-decay properties in superheavy nuclei, suggesting predictive advantages.
A systematic investigation of α-decay properties in even-even isotopic chains of Po (Z=84), Cm (Z=96), Hs (Z=108), and Fl (Z=114) is presented using a semi-classical approach. Ground-state properties, including binding energies and nucleon density distributions, are calculated by minimizing a Skyrme-based energy density functional augmented with microscopic corrections. The derived nuclear densities and Q_α-values are used to construct the α-decay deriving potential through the double-folding model (DFM). The α-decay dynamics are treated quantum mechanically based on the preformed cluster model (PCM) within the Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin (WKB) approximation. The analysis reveals distinct signatures of spherical shell closures at N=126 and N=184, along with secondary anomalies near N = 148, 152, and 162, which are consistent with deformed sub-shell effects predicted by nuclear structure models. The signature of daughter nuclear stability is systematically observed through one or more of the following features: shortened α-decay half-lives, enhanced Q_α values, increased penetrabilities, and/or reduced assault frequencies. A new universal scaling relation, relating the decay half-lives and a scaled combination of nuclear charge and decay energy, is established, showing strong correlation across a wide mass range. Systematic comparisons demonstrate particular predictive advantages for superheavy nuclei, with the proposed method accurately reproducing observed half-life variations across all isotopic chains. The results confirm the sensitivity of α-decay observables to both spherical and deformed shell effects and reinforce the role of α-decay systematics as powerful tools for probing nuclear structure and guiding predictions in unexplored regions of the nuclear chart.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anwar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: