Preclinical analysis shows MOPS immersion improves viable chondrocyte density in allografts, suggesting enhanced outcomes in transplantation.
This preclinical ex vivo study was conducted to evaluate the effects of submersion in saline or the Missouri Osteochondral Preservation System (MOPS®) solution during plug reaming on Day-0 viable chondrocyte density (%VCD) of osteochondral allograft (OCA) plugs used for osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCAT). Distal femoral OCAs preserved with MOPS were reamed to create cylindrical “plug” grafts using one of three techniques: submersion in MOPS (SG–MOPS), submersion in saline (SG–Saline), or reamer saturated with MOPS without OCA submersion (SR–MOPS). All plug reaming was performed using standardized instrumentation and technique to harvest 18-mm-diameter plugs. Pre-reaming cartilage samples were collected to confirm baseline VCD. Post-reaming plugs were bisected and stained for live/dead analysis using fluorescent microscopy. VCD was quantified via image analysis, and %Day-0 VCD was calculated. Group comparisons were made using one-way ANOVA (α=0.05). A total of 21 plugs from 9 donors were analyzed: SG–MOPS (n=8), SG–Saline (n=6), SR–MOPS (n=7). Mean %Day-0 VCD was highest in SG–MOPS (92.6% ± 7.8), followed by SG–Saline (83.3% ± 10.2), and SR–MOPS (80.2% ± 9.1), though differences were not statistically significant (p=0.68). A higher proportion of SG–MOPS plugs (7/8, 88%) exceeded the minimum essential VCD threshold (70%) compared to SG–Saline (4/6, 67%) and SR–MOPS (3/7, 43%). Submerging distal femur osteochondral allografts in MOPS during 18-mm-diameter femoral condyle plug reaming had clinically meaningful beneficial effects on viable donor chondrocyte density when compared to saline-submerged or non-submerged grafts. Based on the use of this submerged reaming technique that is standardized, repeatable, readily available, cost-effective and safe, this methodology can be considered “best practice” for OCA plug reaming protocols, motivating implementation of this evidence-based shift in practice at our institution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rucinski et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: