Policy analysis reveals the educational reforms under China's AI+ Action to foster technological self-reliance, highlighting risks of algorithmic governance.
This paper provides a systematic deconstruction of the education-focused provisions within China's 2025 State Council directive, the "AI+" Action (Guo Fa No. 11). It introduces and develops the theoretical framework of "state-engineered pedagogy"—the deliberate, top-down use of technology by a state to systematically reshape teaching and learning processes to align with national economic and strategic objectives. Utilizing a methodology of policy text analysis, comparative policy mapping, and illustrative case studies substantiated with independent evidence, this paper argues that China's strategy aims to construct a new human-machine collaborative learning paradigm with a dual purpose: to drive domestic educational reform and to cultivate a future workforce capable of securing long-term technological self-reliance and shaping global standards. Through a multi-layered analysis of the policy's architecture, historical evolution, international context, and ethical risks, this paper contends that while the "AI+" mandate promises unprecedented personalization, it also introduces profound risks related to data privacy, algorithmic governance, and the creation of an "algorithmic panopticon." The execution of this policy thus serves as a critical case study in 21st-century statecraft and the global contest over the future of technology and society.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Changkui LI (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: