Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Innovative pleiotropy method improves identification of genetic associations in lipid traits and inflammatory bowel disease subtypes.
Pleiotropy, the phenomenon where a genetic region confers risk to multiple traits, is widely observed, even among seemingly unrelated traits. Knowledge of pleiotropy can improve understanding of biological mechanisms of diseases/traits, and can potentially guide identification of molecular targets or help predict side-effects in drug development. However, statistical approaches for identifying pleiotropy genome-wide are limited, particularly for two correlated traits or case-control traits with unknown sample overlap or for disease traits from family studies. We proposed PLACO+, an improved version of our pleiotropic analysis under composite null hypothesis method based on GWAS summary statistics from two traits. PLACO+ uses an inflated variance model to allow for fractions of variants to be associated with none or only one trait under the null. It is genome-wide scalable, where analytical p-value is computed as a weighted sum of extreme tail probabilities of bivariate normal product distribution. Simulations for both population-based and family-based designs demonstrate well-calibrated type I errors at stringent levels and substantially improved power of PLACO+ over conventional approaches. We illustrate PLACO+ on inflammatory bowel disease subtypes with shared controls and on correlated lipid traits with unknown sample overlap. In particular, PLACO+ revealed pleiotropic regions between triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein levels that conventional approaches missed and all of which were replicated in larger GWAS of these lipid traits. This further demonstrates the utility of PLACO+ in discovering genetic associations of traits with modest sample sizes by leveraging information from another correlated trait.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: