This evaluation demonstrates the high analytical performance of the VitaSIRO assay for SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses, supporting its use in decentralized settings.
Background/Objectives: The concurrent circulation of SARS-CoV-2 with influenza A and B viruses and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) represents a new diagnostic challenge in the post-COVID-19 area, especially considering that these infections have overlapping clinical presentations but different approaches to treatment and management. Multiplexed molecular testing on point-of-care platforms that focus on the simultaneous detection of multiple respiratory viruses in a single tube constitutes a useful approach for diagnosis of respiratory infections in decentralized clinical settings. This study evaluated the analytical performances of the VitaSIRO solo™ SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV Assay performed on the VitaSIRO solo™ Instrument (Credo Diagnostics Biomedical Pte. Ltd., Singapore, Republic of Singapore). Methods: With a view to accreditation, the criteria of the 2022-revised EN ISO 15189:2022 norma were applied for the retrospective on-site verification of method using anonymized respiratory specimens collected during the last 2024–2025 autumn–winter season in France. Results: Usability and satisfaction were comparable to current reference point-of-care platforms, such as the Cepheid GeneXpert® Xpress System (Cepheid Diagnostics, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Repeatability and reproducibility (2.34–4.49% and 2.78–5.71%, respectively) demonstrated a high level of precision. The platform exhibited a low invalid rate (2.9%), with most resolving on retesting. Analytical performance on 301 clinical samples showed high overall sensitivities: 94.8% for SARS-CoV-2 (Ct ≤ 33), 95.8% for influenza A and B viruses, 95.2% for RSV, and 95.4% for all viruses. Specificities were consistently high (99.2–100.0%). False negatives (2.6%) were predominantly associated with high Ct values. Agreement with the comparator reference NeuMoDx™ Flu A-B/RSV/SARS-CoV-2 Vantage Assay (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) was almost perfect (Cohen’s κ 0.939–0.974), and a total of 91.1%, 94.8%, and 100.0% of Ct values were within the 95% limits of agreement for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A and B viruses, and RSV, respectively, by Bland–Altman analyses. Passing–Bablok regression analyses demonstrated good Ct values correlation between VitaSIRO solo™ and NeuMoDx™ assays, with a slight, non-significant, positive bias for the VitaSIRO solo™ assay (mean absolute bias +0.509 to +0.898). Conclusions: These findings support VitaSIRO solo™ Instrument as a user-friendly and reliable point-of-care platform for the rapid detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A and B viruses, and RSV responding to the EN ISO 15189:2022 criteria for accreditation to be implemented in hospital or decentralized settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bouassa et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: