Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
New insights reveal small gaps must exist in the ulam sequence, suggesting intriguing underlying structure.
The Ulam sequence, described by Stanisław Ulam in the 1960s, starts 1, 2 and then iteratively adds the smallest integer that can be uniquely written as the sum of two distinct earlier terms: this gives 1,2,3,4,6,8,11,⋯ Already in 1972 the great French poet Raymond Queneau wrote that it “gives an impression of great irregularity”. This irregularity appears to have a lot of structure and has inspired a great deal of work; nonetheless, very little is actually known. We improve the best upper bound on its growth and show that some small gaps have to exist: for some c>0 and all n∈ℕ, min 1≤k≤n a k+1 a k ≤1+clogn n.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clément et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: