This analysis compares cognitive functions in asthma patients treated with montelukast, highlighting significant differences in MoCA scores versus non-users.
Objective. Recent research suggests that neuroinflammation may play a crucial role in age-related cognitive dysfunction. Studies have investigated the impact of leukotriene receptor (LTR) antagonist montelukast, a medication commonly used to treat allergies and asthma, on the risk of developing dementia. The aim of this study was to compare cognitive functions in asthmatic patients who used montelukast, those who did not use it, and healthy controls. Methods. In this study 50 asthmatic patients (age 67.34±6.44; 20 montelukast users and 30 non-users) were matched with 50 healthy controls (age 68.08±5.95). Each participant was assessed using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Test (MoCA). Memory coefficients (verbal, visual, general, delayed memory, and attention and concentration) were measured by Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R). Results. Orientation, as MoCA subdomain, was worse in patients with asthma compared to the control group (p=0.048). Asthmatic patients treated with montelukast had a significantly higher MoCA score (p=0.033), dominantly due to delayed recall, (p=0.044) than patients without montelukast treatment. People with asthma on montelukast therapy showed statistically significantly better results on the MoCA test (p=0.037) compared to the control group (dominantly due to attention (p=0.032) and delayed recall (p=0.021)). A multiple linear logistic regression model showed statistical significance (p=0.025). The use of montelukast had significant impact on the results of the MOCA test (p=0.012). Conclusion. Montelukast group had better results on MoCA (dominantly due to delayed recall) compared to montelukast non-users. Studies with a larger number of participants are needed to confirm the effect of montelukast on the cognitive status of the elderly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aleksić et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: