Experimental study reveals HFRRC’s superior fatigue resistance in sulfate environments, indicating its potential for engineering structures.
In the saline soil area of western China, the concrete is simultaneously subjected to cyclic loading and sulfate attack. To reveal the effect of sulfate attack on fatigue performance of normal concrete (NC) and hybrid fiber-reinforced rubber concrete (HFRRC), the uniaxial compression test and cyclic loading test were carried out on the specimens after sulfate erosion. The loading strain, plastic strain, and elastic strain of the concrete were compared and analyzed. The compressive strength, fatigue resistance, and strain energy of the concrete were compared and analyzed. Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) measurements were also used to quantify the damage in sulfate attack tests. The results indicate that the fatigue failure stress of concrete is lower than its uniaxial compressive strength. The fatigue resistance coefficient of HFRRC is always higher than that of NC. Under the cyclic loading with the same level, the stress–strain curve of HFRRC is denser than that of NC, exhibiting good elasticity. The energy evolution is independent of whether or not sulfate attacks, but its growth rate is affected by sulfate erosion time. It can provide an experimental and theoretical foundation for the application of HFRRC in engineering structures subjected to repeated loads in sulfate environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: