Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article reveals how necropolitics shapes cultural hegemony in the Middle East, highlighting its role in policy decisions and discourse.
In the theory of necropolitics, we read how a nation, or a group of people, uses power, both military or political, to dictate how certain people in a region can live and how some must die. The Middle East has been a focal point in US foreign policy for five decades, shaping neo-orientalist discourse, American political rhetoric, policy decisions, presidential elections and, crucially, cultural hegemony through the institution of neo-orientalism. This article focuses on the imperial use of power – political and military – in the theoretical framework of necropolitics and neo-orientalism. To this end, this article presents an articulation of the role of necropolitical power as a conceptual tool that accounts for the overwhelming presence of death in contemporary politics of superpowers such as the United States. Necropolitics as an unauthorized element of neo-orientalism; it takes a primary role in shaping neo-orientalist discourse while accounting for cultural hegemony, political disorder, and neo-colonial interests. Through situating cultural hegemony within the framework of necropolitics, we can move from discourse to death with respect to the contemporary politics of neo-orientalism, and we can find how necropolitics provides a helpful tool of analysis for culturally invoked violence, and specifically death resulting from necropolitical practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Altwaiji et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: