Randomized clinical trial shows faster bleeding control with SR cannula in atonic PPH cases, suggesting practical benefits.
Background: Atonic PPH is a leading cause of maternal mortality. The SR cannula offers a low-cost, practical alternative by creating negative intrauterine pressure that mimics natural uterine retraction. To compare effectiveness of SR vacuum suction cannula and with uterotonic drugs in cases of Atonic PPH. Methods: This prospective study at GMC Akola enrolled 100 women developing atonic PPH after AMTSL. Patients were randomized to SR cannula (n=50) or uterotonics (n=50). Group A: Cannula inserted up to fundus, negative suction at 650 mmHg for 10 min, repeated hourly 3 times. Group B: Uterotonics given as needed sequentially (Methergine → Carbetocin→Misoprostol→Carboprost) with 15-min interval. All patients were observed for bleeding, tone, vitals; Results: In Group A (SR cannula), bleeding stopped in <4 min in 64%, 5-9 min in 26%, 10-14 min in 4% and >14 min in 6%. In Group B (uterotonics),in 6%, 52%, 30% and 12% respectively. Mean blood loss was 302.85±106.07ml in Group A vs 377.9±135.41ml in Group B. Conclusions: SR cannula is as effective as uterotonics for atonic PPH, with faster bleeding control, lower cost, reusability and transport feasibility, yet larger studies are needed for validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raghuwanshi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: