Review highlights improved success rates and reduced complications in ultrasound-guided IV access, suggesting a shift toward best practices.
This review addresses ongoing controversies and advancements concerning ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter insertion. Growing evidence suggests that ultrasound-guided insertion of peripheral IV catheter represents a superior technique across various patient populations, particularly those presenting with difficult IV access (DIVA). Key findings highlight significant improvements in first-attempt success rates, reduction of procedural complications, enhanced patient comfort, and the potential for substantial long-term cost-effectiveness, despite the cost of initial investment and training. However, obtaining these improvements involves a critical importance for standardized training, adherence to rigorous aseptic techniques, and generalization of the transformative impact of ongoing technological advancements in ultrasound devices. The collective body of evidence supports the widespread adoption of ultrasound-guided peripheral IV cannulation as an evidence-based best practice in modern healthcare.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bruant et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: