This analysis reveals how Chaucer disaggregates voice and name in his work, suggesting new insights into literary personhood and ethical authority.
Literary personhood takes shape between voice and name—that is, between first-person traces of locutionary agents in discourse and the third-person suturing of individuals into the textual record. This conceptual pair can help scholars organize the varied populace of literature, with its rabble of characters, personifications, dramatis personae , narrators, and so forth. But voice and name are also key terms in medieval poet Geoffrey Chaucer's House of Fame , a speculative critique of poetic tradition (especially Dante) and literary person-making. Chaucer theorizes literary persons by disaggregating them into voice and name, thereby undermining poetry's ethical authority while showing its inescapable anthropomorphism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Julie Orlemanski (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: