This analysis reveals elastic anisotropy and thermophysical behaviors in Au10In3, suggesting its potential in microelectronics.
This study presents a thorough investigation of the Au10In3 intermetallic compound using density functional theory, to clarify its fundamental properties and potential applications in microelectronic packaging and high-reliability bonding. As a significant yet underexplored phase in the Au–In system, Au10In3 is systematically analyzed through first-principles calculations within a generalized gradient approximation framework, focusing on its structural stability, anisotropic elastic response and thermophysical properties. Optimized structural calculations confirm the thermodynamic stability of Au10In3, with a negative formation enthalpy of −0.138 eV/atom. Elastic constants satisfy mechanical stability criteria, establishing the compound's stability under mechanical stress. Further mechanical analysis implies ductile behavior, indicated by a high Pugh's ratio of 4.94, positive Cauchy pressures and a Poisson's ratio of 0.405. The material demonstrates Vickers hardness of 1.40 GPa and fracture toughness of 0.897 MPa·m1/2, reflecting resistance to both deformation and fracture. Elastic anisotropy of Au10In3 is estimated with several indices: symmetry-invariant universal anisotropy index (AU) is 1.21, Zener-based equivalent anisotropy parameter (Aeq) is 2.63 and logarithmic Euclidean metric (AL) is 0.48. Directional dependence of elastic moduli is illustrated through three-dimensional mappings of Young's modulus, shear modulus and Poisson's ratio, providing insight into its anisotropic behavior. In thermophysical characteristics, Au10In3 presents a Debye temperature of 151.5 K, thermal expansion coefficient of 24.3 ppm/K and lattice thermal conductivity of 0.291 W/mK, indicative of low phonon transport efficiency. Comparative analyses with related phases, Au3In and Au3In2, highlight that Au10In3 possesses intermediate mechanical strength and thermal conductivity within the Au–In system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: