Observational analysis shows enclosures did not significantly enhance agricultural productivity in Sweden, suggesting secure property rights played a key role.
Did enclosures lead to increased agricultural productivity? Enclosures have been held to be an important catalyst for agricultural development in eighteenth and nineteenth century Europe, although the results from previous research are mixed. In this article, we provide new evidence using a database of all market transactions of agricultural properties in a Swedish county during the mid-nineteenth century. We show that buyers of agricultural properties did not value enclosed land much higher than open field land. Property rights were thus either sufficiently secure to enable land use intensification regardless or increased production in enclosed farms was counteracted by increasing factor costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Persarvet et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: