Randomized trial evaluated targeted lung denervation's effects on COPD exacerbations compared to standard treatment, indicating minimal improvement in outcomes.
Rationale: AIRFLOW-3 was a 1:1 randomized, double blind, sham controlled trial of the d'Nerva Targeted Lung Denervation (TLD) System in patients with COPD. Objective: Evaluate the impact of TLD on COPD exacerbations compared to optimal medical treatment. Methods: AIRFLOW-3 patients were symptomatic (CAT ≥10) with moderate to very severe airflow obstruction (25% ≤ FEV1 ≤ 80% predicted) and GOLD E status (≥2 moderate or ≥1 severe exacerbation over prior 12 months). The primary endpoint was comparison of time-to-first moderate or severe COPD exacerbation through 12 months between the Treatment (TLD + optimal medical treatment) and Sham Control groups (sham procedure + optimal medical treatment). Secondary endpoints included rate of severe COPD exacerbations, change in quality of life (SGRQ-C and SF-36), change in lung function (FVC, FEV1, RV), and change in CAT. Measurements and Main Results: 388 patients were randomized 1:1 at 32 sites. There was no difference between TLD compared to sham treatment in probability of participants having a moderate or severe COPD exacerbation, HR 1.268 (95% CI, 0.988 to 1.628). At 1 year, the TLD group had less dyspnea (> 1 point improvement in TDI 35.4 vs 24.1%, p 0.021) compared to sham. Post-hoc analyses revealed that failure to reach the primary endpoint was driven by an insufficient number of patients exhibiting an airway-predominant phenotype (lung hyperinflation without significant emphysema). Conclusions: AIRFLOW-3 failed to meet its primary endpoint. However, post-hoc analyses identified a responder profile; a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial is being designed to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shah et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: