Experiential analysis compares total cost of ownership for commercial and diagnostic-grade displays, highlighting cost implications.
With the increasing shift towards remote radiology work, institutions face the challenge of balancing cost-effectiveness with operational reliability. This experiential report presents a comparative analysis of the total cost of ownership (TCO) of commercial-grade displays (WCDs) and diagnostic-grade displays (WDDs) in remote diagnostic stations. We evaluate direct and indirect costs associated with each display type using activity-based costing, focusing on deployment, quality control (QC) processes, and ongoing maintenance. Our findings suggest that while CGDs offer significant initial cost savings, their long-term maintenance requirements, particularly in manual QC, increase recurring expenses. The crossover point for CGDs with monthly QC occurs at approximately five years against mid-level DGDs, potentially making DGDs a more sustainable option over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hulme et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: