PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Physical review. D/Physical review. D.42 citationsOpen Access

Scalar-field dark energy models: Current and forecast constraints

View Full Paper
ASAnowar J. ShajibJFJ. Frieman

Key Points

  • The current value of the equation-of-state parameter w0 is estimated at -0.90 with 2.9σ discrepancy from ΛCDM.
  • Combining data from SNe Ia and BAO strongly favors scalar-field models over ΛCDM with substantial Bayesian evidence.
  • Future surveys like DESI-extension will likely distinguish between the wϕCDM model and ΛCDM at over 9σ.
  • The reduction in S8 tension suggests evolving dark energy models provide new insights into cosmic expansion.

Abstract

Recent results from type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) and baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), in combination with cosmic microwave background (CMB) measurements, have focused renewed attention on dark energy models with a time-varying equation-of-state parameter, w(z). In this paper, we describe the simplest, physically motivated models of evolving dark energy that are consistent with the recent data, a broad subclass of the so-called thawing scalar-field models that we dub wϕCDM. We provide a quasiuniversal, quasi-one-parameter functional fit to the scalar-field wϕ(z) that captures the behavior of these models more informatively than the standard w0wa phenomenological parametrization; their behavior is completely described by the current value of the equation-of-state parameter, w0=w(z=0). Combining current data from BAO (DESI data release 2), the CMB ( and ACT), large-scale structure (DES year-3 3×2pt), SNe Ia (DES-SN5YR), and strong lensing (TDCOSMO+SLACS), for wϕCDM, we obtain w0=−0.904−0.033+0.034, 2.9σ discrepant from the Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) model. The Bayesian evidence ratio substantially favors this wϕCDM model over ΛCDM. The data combination that yields the strongest discrepancy with ΛCDM is BAO+SNe Ia, for which w0=−0.837−0.045+0.044, 3.6σ discrepant from ΛCDM and with a Bayesian evidence ratio strongly in favor. We find that the so-called S8 tension between the CMB and large-scale structure is slightly reduced in these models, while the Hubble tension is slightly increased. We forecast constraints on these models from near-future surveys (DESI-extension and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory LSST), showing that the current best-fit wϕCDM model will be distinguishable from ΛCDM at over 9σ.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shajib et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1956b9b7b07f3a06199bfhttps://doi.org/10.1103/kjpb-r698
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper