Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Field study assesses sprayer nozzle types affecting weed control efficacy and potato yield, indicating key findings.
A three-year field study (2018–2020) was conducted at the Agricultural Experimental Station in Zawady, University of Siedlce, to assess the influence of sprayer nozzle type on weed control effica- cy and potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) yield. The experiment was arranged in a split-plot design with three replications, on slightly acidic soil classified as very good rye complex. Two experimental factors were evaluated: (1) edible potato cultivars (‘Jurek’ and ‘Finezja’) and (2) herbicide application methods using different nozzle types. The following treatments were included: (1) control – mechanical cultivation (four hilling operations combined with pre-emergence harrowing and one post-emergence hilling); (2) herbicide application with AP12003 flat-fan nozzles; (3) herbicide application with HCI8003 hollow-cone nozzles; and (4) herbicide application with Hypro 3D nozzles FC-3D100-03. Spraying in all chemical treatments was performed at 4 bar pressure with a flow rate of 1.39 L min⁻¹. The study demonstrated that herbicide application using hollow-cone nozzles resulted in the highest potato yield, significantly exceeding that of the control treatment. Furthermore, the highest weed control efficacy was achieved with the hollow-cone nozzles. The findings underscore the critical role of appropriate nozzle selection in enhancing herbicide performance, reducing weed infestation, and improving potato productivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rzążewska et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: