This analysis investigates mechanical behavior using Out–In ASA and In–Out ASA configurations, showing implications for structural safety.
For tunnels constructed in a single direction, the pipe roof at the tunnel exit portal can be installed either as Outside-to-Inside advanced support arrangements (Out–In ASA) or Inside-to-Outside advanced support arrangements (In–Out ASA). To investigate the pipe roof’s mechanical behavior and deformation characteristics under two excavation methods, this study establishes Pasternak two-parameter elastic foundation beam models for the pipe roof. Corresponding boundary conditions are proposed for each support configuration, and the governing differential equation for pipe roof deflection is derived and solved. The Hanjiashan Tunnel is used as an engineering case study to validate the theoretical results by comparing them with field monitoring data. A comparative analysis and parametric sensitivity study are then conducted for the two construction methods. The results show that theoretical predictions align well with the field measurements, confirming the validity of the proposed model. This study proposed calculation parameters for the Hanjiashan Tunnel. Under this circumstance, the method of Out–In ASA has been proven to offer improved structural performance and safety when the tunnel face is close to the portal. Moreover, the timely installation of the initial support and the strong bearing capacity of the surrounding rock can further reduce pipe roof deformation near the tunnel exit. Therefore, the Out–In ASA method is recommended for single-direction tunnel excavation. If the method of Out–In ASA is not feasible due to site constraints, the method of In–Out ASA can be adopted, while early support and effective grouting should be guaranteed to ensure control of excessive deformation. The findings of this study can provide a theoretical reference for the construction of tunnel portals in single-direction excavation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: