Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study demonstrates how trust and emotional states mediate AI anchor impacts on purchase intention.
This study investigates how AI-driven virtual anchors affect consumers’ purchase intentions by identifying their key attributes, underlying mechanisms, and configurational interplay. We integrate latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA), structural equation modeling (SEM), and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) into a unified methodological framework. Empirical evidence demonstrates that the public visibility of virtual anchors exerts a significant positive impact on purchase intention, whereas professionalism, responsiveness, and personalization primarily cultivate consumer pleasure and trust, yet exert limited direct influence on purchase decisions. Emotional states—arousal, pleasure, and trust—mediate the relationship between anchor characteristics and purchase intention. fsQCA further reveals that high purchase intention emerges when responsiveness serves as a necessary condition, trust operates as a pivotal hub, and arousal/pleasure function as emotional conduits; conversely, low purchase intention is chiefly attributable to deficiencies in visibility, responsiveness, and trust. By synthesizing the SOR (stimulus-organism-response) model with the PAD (Pleasure-Arousal-Dominance) emotion theory, this research extends theoretical insights into consumer behavior within e-commerce live-streaming contexts and provides actionable guidance for optimizing virtual anchor strategies, thereby advancing both standardization and innovation in the industry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: