This study examines language impairments and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing awake surgery, suggesting enhanced diagnostic tools are needed.
Background Language deficits caused by gliomas can persist beyond the short-term, and should not be overlooked due to their influence on a patient’s quality of life. The aim of this study was to investigate language impairments and long-term outcome after awake surgery. Methods The Diagnostic Instrument for Mild Aphasia (DIMA) and traditional language tests were administered preoperatively (T1; n=79), and 3 (T2; n=68) and 12 months (T3; n=35) postoperatively in the groups of patients with less (Group 1) and more (Group 2) invasive brain tumors. Results Preoperative deficits were found with DIMA at the level of lexico-syntax in Group 1 in both hemispheres and at the level of phonology and lexico-syntax in Group 2. With traditional language tests, preoperative deficits were detected at the level of word retrieval and verbal fluency in all groups. Only DIMA revealed long-term mild language impairments, which were observed at the phonological and semantic level in patients with left-hemispheric tumors, and at the lexico-syntactic level in those with right-hemispheric tumors. Conclusions In this cohort mild language impairments were noted long-term with DIMA across different linguistic levels, irrespective of hemispheric tumor location. Alongside the traditional language tests, DIMA represents a valuable addition for the diagnostic evaluation of language impairments in patients with gliomas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vogrinčič et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: