Retrospective cohort study shows improved trough concentrations in kidney transplant recipients, indicating effective post-transplant care.
Introduction Nowadays, kidney transplant recipients’ primary challenge is improving graft function. However, they are rarely provided effective long-term instructions on immunosuppressant use after transplant. This study aimed to describe the experiences of a pharmacist-led, closed-loop immunosuppressant service (PLIS) in the transplant center of a general hospital in China. Methods A retrospective pre-and post‐intervention study was conducted in the transplantation department in a general hospital. Of the 347 patients receiving kidney transplants from August 2022 to August 2024 were enrolled. Eligible subjects were assigned into two groups (pre‐intervention group and post‐intervention group) according to the date (1 August 2023) when the pharmacist commenced participation in the post‐transplant management for kidney transplant recipients. The intra-patient variation in immunosuppressant trough concentrations (C min ) before and after the intervention was defined as the primary outcome. The secondary outcome was to assess the impact on renal function. Results Among 347 patients (August 2022–2024), those managed post-intervention (from August 2023) showed improved target trough concentration (C min ) attainment versus pre-intervention: tacrolimus (TAC, 72.4% vs. 58.3%, P =0.012), cyclosporine (CsA, 63.7% vs. 46.5%, P =0.037), mycophenolate (MMF, 76.0% vs. 65.3%, P =0.025), and sirolimus (SRL, 80.2% vs. 51.9%, P =0.018). Compared to pre-intervention, the percentage coefficient of variation (%CV) decreased significantly for TAC (18.28% vs. 8.92%, P =0.031) and CsA (22.97% vs. 7.14%, P =0.004) post-intervention, while MMF maintained high variability (CV >30%). SRL variability declined at 6–12 months (17.02% vs. 26.05%, P =0.194). Renal function improved post-intervention, with reductions in serum creatinine, urea nitrogen, cystatin C, and microproteinuria ( P <0.05). Conclusion PLIS enhanced immunosuppressant management precision and graft outcomes, demonstrating its utility in standardizing post-transplant care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: