During World War II, Raphael Lemkin despaired at the limitations of awareness in the Western world, including the United States, which failed to believe the accumulating evidence of the Holocaust. The unfamiliarity of such extreme atrocities, which extended beyond the general horizon of perception, inevitably led to disbelief and indifference, leaving people wandering in a “twilight between knowing and not knowing.” Lemkin recognized this cognitive and imaginative limitation of the West through British Prime Minister Winston Churchill’s speech in August 1941, in which Churchill declared, “We are in the presence of a crime without a name.” Lemkin realized that the absence of terminology to describe such phenomena contributed to the failure to grasp their reality. Fluent in nine languages and possessing an exceptional sensitivity to linguistic nuances, Lemkin sought to create a short, powerful word that could immediately convey the gravity of such crimes to the public. Drawing from historical instances such as the persecution of the Armenian minority in the Ottoman Empire and the Holocaust, he worked to craft a term that could encapsulate these extreme events. In 1944, he finally coined the term “genocide” by combining the Greek word ‘genos’ (meaning tribe or race) with the Latin suffix ‘cide’ (meaning killing). This neologism allowed the horrific crimes, epitomized by the Holocaust—previously existing beyond the limits of human perception and imagination—to be integrated into the public consciousness. The new term functioned as a tool to overcome the barriers of awareness and to succinctly convey the enormity of such crimes to the masses. Over time, labeling an event as ‘genocide’ began to evoke a sense of urgency and moral obligation, instilling in people both distress and a motivation to intervene.
Sangkul Kim (Fri,) studied this question.