Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis of Keplerian scaling shows modest improvement in solar system data, suggesting potential limits in exoplanet studies.
Abstract We revisit Kepler’s third law in an instrument-aware, catalog-wide setting by casting the Keplerian scaling as a nested null model. The alternative augments log P with a minimal logistic term. Using the Solar System as a calibrated positive control, we recover a modest yet detectable effect localized near a trajectory-dependent encounter scale. Applying the same pipeline to public exoplanet catalogs (PSCompPars and KOI), the logistic extension is disfavored by information criteria (AICc/BIC) with negative likelihood-ratio statistics; the maximum-likelihood amplitude is â = 0. We therefore report a 95% profile-likelihood upper bound α₉₅, providing a falsifiable benchmark for future, physically motivated multivariate corrections. Using the Solar System as a calibrated positive control, we find a modest yet detectable improvement: ∆AICc = −1.6, ∆BIC = −0.5, LRT = 3.1 (p = 0.078), and a 4.2% reduction in cross-validated residual scale. By contrast, the exoplanet ensembles are disfavored, with ∆AICc = +2.8 and ∆BIC = +5.3 (> 0), â = 0, and α95 = 0.07.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
kazufumi kimura (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: