Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article presents thumb rules to enhance systematic literature reviews, highlighting knowledge gaps and research significance.
As research matures across various disciplines, the importance of systematic literature reviews (SLRs) grows significantly. These reviews help establish research contexts, identify knowledge gaps, and justify scholarly inquiry. In this context, the present article outlines key thumb rules for crafting a classic systematic literature review and offers practical suggestions to enhance its likelihood of acceptance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J.C. Paul (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: